Legal Opinion · Dissent

Quarry v. Doe I

California Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2012No. S171382Published

1Dissent

LIU, J., Dissenting.

In this case, six brothers seek compensatory relief from the Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland for adult psychological injuries allegedly caused by childhood sexual abuse perpetrated by a priest assigned to their local parish. In their amended complaint, plaintiffs provide a disturbing and detailed account of recurring abuse by the same priest, and equally disturbing allegations of institutional avoidance and inattention. Whether those allegations are true, we will never know, as the Quarry brothers are now barred from having their day in court. Because the statute oh which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Shirk v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API