Legal Opinion

Srednick v. Sylak

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1941No. Appeals, 100, 110 and 120PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

Two of these appeals are from an order granting a new trial; the third is from the refusal of judgment n. o. v. The suit was brought November 10, 1938, and is governed by the sci. fa. acts in effect at that time and not by the Buies of Civil Procedure (2251 to 2275), effective September 4, 1939. The plaintiff sued Sylak. Sylak brought in Openhart, as additional defendant, on averments that plaintiffs injury was caused by the negligence of Openhart or by the joint negligence of Sylak and Openhart. He then amended his writ by eliminating the charge of joint…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Vinnacombe v. Phila. Am. S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Goldman v. Mitchell-Fletcher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Koontz v. Messer & Quaker State Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Cucchi v. Rollins Protective Services Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Mattia v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. In Re Estate of RoosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Bessemer Stores, Inc. v. Reed Shaw Stenhouse, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Computer Print Systems, Inc. v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API