Legal Opinion

Mattia v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1987No. 3192PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, President Judge:

This case concerns a claim for contribution and indemnity by a retailer against a manufacturer for an allegedly defective bicycle which caused injury to the consumer-purchaser. In response to special interrogatories, the jury found that the retailer was negligent but that the product was not defective at the time it left the manufacturer’s control. The trial court instructed the jury that it should consider whether the retailer was entitled to indemnity and contribution based on the law of strict liability. The retailer appealed the court’s refusal to charge that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burch v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Edward Rabatin v. Columbus Lines, Inc. And Union Carbide Corporation. Appeal of Columbus Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  3. Svetz for Svetz v. Land Tool Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Capone v. DonovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. National Liberty Life Insurance v. Kling PartnershipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Childers v. Power Line Equipment Rentals, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Ettinger v. Triangle-Pacific Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Martin v. Rite Aid of Pennsylvania, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Baker v. AC&S, INC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. MIIX Insurance Co. v. EpsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API