Hilton v. Hilton
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to secure a divorce from the defendant, and as grounds therefor charged, as a first cause of action, that the defendant had, on divers occasions, committed acts of cruelty upon and toward him, and as a second cause of action, that she had been guilty of adultery. As to the last charge, the amended complaint alleges: That three children have been born since said marriage, to wit: Laura Hilton, a daughter, aged thirteen years; Edwin Hilton, a son, aged seven years, and Clarence Hilton, aged about five months; “that (Paragraph IV of second cause of action)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McNamara v. McNamaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- More v. MoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Chatham v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Estate of WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Smith v. LombardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Walsh v. MajorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Estate of NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.