Legal Opinion

Hilton v. Hilton

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 6, 1921No. Civ. No. 2339PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to secure a divorce from the defendant, and as grounds therefor charged, as a first cause of action, that the defendant had, on divers occasions, committed acts of cruelty upon and toward him, and as a second cause of action, that she had been guilty of adultery. As to the last charge, the amended complaint alleges: That three children have been born since said marriage, to wit: Laura Hilton, a daughter, aged thirteen years; Edwin Hilton, a son, aged seven years, and Clarence Hilton, aged about five months; “that (Paragraph IV of second cause of action)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McNamara v. McNamaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. More v. MoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Chatham v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Estate of WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Smith v. LombardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Walsh v. MajorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Estate of NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API