Legal Opinion

Mary J. BEST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 25, 1991No. 90-3158PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

We are presented with two issues on this appeal: (1) whether a plaintiff is entitled to recover pain, suffering, and humiliation damages in excess of $2,000 and punitive damages under the Kansas Acts Against Discrimination; and (2) whether a plaintiff is entitled to a jury trial in federal court when her claim is based upon the Kansas Acts Against Discrimination. The district court resolved both issues against the plaintiff, and we affirm.

FACTS

Plaintiff-appellant Mary Best was employed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) in Topeka, Kansas. Best…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Simler v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Palmer v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Swackhammer v. Sprint/United Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Shaw v. AAA Engineering & Drafting, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Wagher v. Guy's Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  4. Ballou v. University of Kansas Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  5. Miller v. BrungardtDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API