Legal Opinion

Miller v. Brungardt

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 9, 1996No. Civil Action 94-2518-GTVPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VAN BEBBER, Chief Judge.

This case is before the court upon motion to dismiss by defendants Kerry Brungardt and Richard W. Flores (Doc. 22) and upon motion to reconsider the court’s memorandum and order dated October 3, 1995, by all defendants (Doc. 25). For the reasons stated below, the motions are granted in part and denied in part.

Motion to Dismiss

Plaintiff Jane D. Miller filed suit, alleging sexual harassment and retaliatory discharge in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Kansas Act Against Discrimination (KAAD), K.S.A. § 44-1001 et seq., as well…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Busby v. City of OrlandoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Marguerite Hicks v. The Gates Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Sauers v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. Swanson v. BixlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wanjiku v. Johnson CountyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2016
  2. Dunegan v. City of Council Grove, Kansas Water DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
  3. Phillips v. HumbleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States ex rel. Coffman v. City of LeavenworthDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
  5. Garcia v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API