Legal Opinion
Mauk v. Wright
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 7, 1973No. Civ. 71-362PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HERMAN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION:
The instant case arises out of an automobile accident in which the plaintiff Denise Mauk was injured. 1 Miss Mauk was the sole occupant of a 1969 Volkswagen owned by the plaintiff Paul L. Finkler. The defendant Stephen T. Wright was the driver of the other vehicle, a 1968 Lincoln Continental, owned by defendant Roy L. Schmidt. Both Wright and Schmidt were employed as professional football players for the defendant Pro Football, Inc. (hereinafter the Washington Redskins). The Redskins and Schmidt have separately moved for summary judgment.
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Don Chuy, in No. 77-1412 v. The Philadelphia Eagles Football Club (Sued as "The Philadelphia Eagles"), in No. 77-1411 and the National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Shuman Estate v. WeberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Chuy v. Philadelphia Eagles Football ClubDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Kang v. Charles Pankow AssociatesHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
- Joyce, Mary and Joyce, Michael, H/w v. Super Fresh Food Markets, Inc. Appeal of Mary and Michael JoyceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.