Legal Opinion

Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1959No. Appeal, No. 95PublishedCited by 357 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice McBride,

This ease is here on plaintiff’s appeal from the refusal of the court below to take off a compulsory non-suit.

In 1948 defendant, Counties Contracting and Construction Company, under contract to defendant, Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania, constructed an underground conduit to carry telephone lines along Baltimore Avenue in Lansdowne, Pennsylvania. In 1950 after an inspection which revealed no structural or other defects, plaintiff purchased a house on Baltimore Avenue. Sometime prior to March 25, 1951, he discovered seepage in his basement, which proved to…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Lewey v. H. C. Fricke Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Karcesky v. LariaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Miller v. HickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Ebersole v. BeistlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by357 opinions

  1. Fine v. CheccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Cathcart v. Keene Industrial InsulationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

352 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API