Legal Opinion

Incollingo v. EWING

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1971No. Appeals, 395, 408 and 410PublishedCited by 309 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Pomeroy,

We have before us three appeals from the judgments entered on jury verdicts in favor of plaintiffs, the parents and administrators of the Estate of Mary Ann Incollingo (herein “Mary Ann”), a minor, on account of injuries to and the death of the minor allegedly caused by the wrongful administration of the drug known as Chloromycetin, a trade name for Chloramphenicol, a broad spectrum antibiotic.1 The original defendant was Peirce G. Ewing, a druggist, the complaint charging that he negligently provided Chloromycetin without prescription. Ewing joined as additional…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Evans v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Love v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Sterling Drug, Inc., a Corporation v. Irene M. YarrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by309 opinions

  1. Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

304 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API