Vail v. Pacific Fish Products Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiffs commenced an action against the defendants and alleged their claims in three common counts, each being for moneys laid out and expended for the defendants. The defendants answered, and in their answer first they denied each of the allegations contained in each count in the plaintiffs’ complaint; second, to each count they interposed a separate defense to the effect that the subject matter of that particular count in plaintiffs’ complaint was a part of a larger transaction, to wit, a copartnership enterprise between the plaintiffs and the defendants as copartners; third, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Keyes v. NimsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Hoff v. Los Angeles Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Tuttle v. BlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Butler v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Chapman v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- St. James Church of Christ Holiness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Lane v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Churchill v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Locke v. DuchesnayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- McSherry v. the Market CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933