Legal Opinion
Churchill v. Peters
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 4, 1943No. Civ. 3038PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
This is an appeal on the judgment roll alone. Therefore, no evidence introduced at the trial of the case is before this court for consideration. This is of particular significance in considering the three questions which appellant argues in his brief on appeal.
Plaintiff and respondent instituted this suit to obtain an accounting; to have the court adjudicate the question whether, by the evidence and a certain document attached to the complaint as an exhibit, a limited partnership had been created; to have it adjudged and determined what interest plaintiff, as well as about 70 named…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Heinrich v. HeinrichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Overell v. OverellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. PrestonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Sammons v. DavisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Keyston v. KeystonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Jones v. StubbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Olson v. Biola Cooperative Raisin Growers Assn.California Supreme Court · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.