Legal Opinion

Locke v. Duchesnay

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 15, 1927No. Docket No. 3013PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Plaintiff had judgment in an action to recover for work and labor performed, etc., in plowing, grading, and leveling a certain tract of land situate in the county of San Joaquin, and the defendant Silva appeals.

The appellant assigns five specific errors, as reasons for reversal of the judgment herein, to wit: 1. Error of the trial court in allowing amendments to pleadings to conform to the proofs; 2. Errors of the trial court in admitting evidence; 3. Error in denying appellant’s motion for a non-suit; 4. That the findings of fact and conclusions of law are not supported by the evidence; 5.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Willett & Burr v. AlpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Vail v. Pacific Fish Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Oliver v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Haggerty v. WarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Hansen v. BurfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Rains v. ArnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Higgins v. Desert Braemar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API