Lane v. Whitaker
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McWILLIAMS, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff, who sues as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, -from a judgment in favor of the defendant. The action was tried on the fourth amended complaint of plaintiff. The complaint alleges three causes of action. The first cause of action is based upon the theory that plaintiff’s husband was- a beneficiary under an oral trust by the terms of which plaintiff, as his administratrix, claims to be entitled to certain personal property in the possession of defendant. The property in controversy, according to the complaint, was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Austin v. WilcoxsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Woolsey v. WoolseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Vail v. Pacific Fish Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- Khoury v. BarhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Ripling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Tibbitts v. FifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Rench v. McMullenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Pfingst v. GoettingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.