Chapman v. Hughes
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
This is an action for an accounting with reference to certain real estate transactions in which plaintiffs claim to be interested with defendant .as partners, and in which it is alleged large profits were made and appropriated by defendant, who refused to .account. Findings were in favor of defendant upon all the issues, upon which judgment was entered in his favor, and plaintiffs appeal from the judgment upon a ■bill of exceptions.
The pleadings and findings are voluminous, but from the view we take of the questions involved no extended statement of the facts is required.
1. On the question…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Duryea v. WhitcombSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
3Cited by19 opinions
- Westcott v. GilmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Constans v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Kaufman-Brown Potato Co. v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- San Joaquin Light & Power Corp. v. CostaloupesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Swarthout v. GentryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.