Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Furman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 10, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 28, 2002, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
In December 2000, claimant requested a six-month leave of absence in order to undergo cosmetic surgery in Russia. This leave was not approved, however, claimant was authorized for two weeks of vacation. Claimant did not return from her authorized vacation leave on the expected date. Claimant contends that while in Russia, she notified the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of CranstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of BlankenshipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of NikkhahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of MaricleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of OakfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of HenriksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008