Legal Opinion
In re Hill
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 8, 2007PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 25, 2006, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Claimant began working at a bank as a senior collection agent on July 18, 2000. He was granted a medical leave of absence from June 15, 2004 until July 12, 2004 and an unpaid leave of absence until August 9, 2004. Thereafter, he sought to extend his unpaid leave of absence through September 28, 2004, but *932failed to provide his employer with…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of FurmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of EnneddamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of OakfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re TanvirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of PuchalskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Matter of Cunningham (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- In re the Claim of AbendAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.