Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Blankenship
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 12, 2001PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 15, 2000, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her, employment without good cause.
*862Claimant, a per diem substitute cleaner for a school district, left her employment after her hours were reduced from eight hours a day to four hours a day. The record establishes that claimant was initially hired to cover for a full-time employee who was on disability. When the employee returned from disability, claimant’s hours varied…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of Le PoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of KerrsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of KabuyaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re the Claim of RahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of FurmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of GrecoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of MallimoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re EbisikeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.