Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Cranston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 9, 2002PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 22, 2001, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Near the end of an authorized bereavement leave, claimant notified her employer through a friend that her return to work would be delayed due to a second death in the family. Claimant’s supervisor testified that the friend was told that claimant would have to notify the employer personally regarding the anticipated date of her return to work…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GilletteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of NikkhahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re the Claim of AlvaradoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. In re the Claim of MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RaykinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of FurmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of OakfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of RoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. In re the Claim of HenriksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API