In re the Claim of Henrikson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 10, 2003, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Claimant was employed as a drywall installer. After claimant and his partner had a disagreement and the partner left the job site, claimant was unable to continue hanging the ceiling himself so he also left. Claimant testified that he tried to contact the employer once the following day, but made no attempt thereafter to request that he be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of CranstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of FurmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of FormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of RoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004