Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Oakford
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 12, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 15, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Claimant was working as a receptionist for a law firm when she planned a trip to France and requested permission to take five vacation days. As claimant had already used all but four of her annual vacation days, the employer gave her permission to take four days off. Claimant nonetheless was absent from work for five business days. Upon her return, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of CranstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of FurmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of WilderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of JimenezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of CruseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of Saeed-Ur-RehmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005