Legal Opinion

Skidmore v. West

California Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1921No. Sac. No. 2992PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

This is a mandamus proceeding to compel the payment by respondent, treasurer of Placer County, of a warrant for $2,231.48 issued by the county auditor upon a claim of petitioners allowed by the board of supervisors of the county. The matter was submitted upon a general demurrer to the petition. The only question pre sented is whether the purported contract between petitioners and the county of Placer, made on behalf of the county by its board of supervisors, was in excess of the authority of such board and therefore void.

The material facts shown by the petition are substantially as follows:…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. House v. Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. County of Humboldt v. SternCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jaynes v. StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Speer v. KratzensteinNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Butler v. Compton Junior College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Southern Pacific R.R. Co. v. StibbensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Arnold v. Custer CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API