Legal Opinion
Cotta v. City and County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 18, 2007No. A116583PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAERLE, J.—
I. INTRODUCTION
In this appeal, we must determine whether the City and County of San Francisco (City) 1 may be liable for contract damages following a valid exercise of its police power. In March 2003, the San Francisco Airport Commission (Commission) passed a resolution granting certain benefits to drivers of clean air taxis providing transit service at San Francisco International Airport (SFO). Thereafter, plaintiffs and appellants Alex Cotta, Aloizio Costa, Majed Dajani, Andrew Lindemann, Isam Kayed, Mohamad Quitteineh, and Saleem Shaikh purchased compressed natural gas…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Longshore v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Wilson v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- San Mateo Union High School District v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- City of Brentwood v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- San Diego City Firefighters v. Board of Administration of San Diego City Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Mehta v. Wells Fargo Bank, NADistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. FSI, Financial Solutions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.