Legal Opinion
Jones v. Bernanke
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 15, 2010No. Civil Action 04-1696(RMU)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Granting The Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Supplement the Complaint; Denying Without Prejudice the Plaintiff’s Motion for Discovery
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs motion for leave to supplement his complaint and motion for discovery. The plaintiff, a former employee of the Federal Reserve, commenced this action alleging that the defendant discriminated against him on the basis of his age and gender and retaliated against him for participating in protected activity, in violation of the Age Discrimination in…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Mount v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Nguyen v. WinterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Hyson v. Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Thomas v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Cavalier v. Catholic Univ. of Am.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.