In Re Cornelius Mulder and Henricus Elisabeth Jozef Wulms
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from the July 27, 1982, decision, adhered to on reconsideration October 19, 1982, of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) affirming the examiner’s rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of certain claims 1 of appellants’ application, serial No. 602,473, filed August 6, 1975, for “Integrated Circuit.” Appellants claim the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of a convention filing date in the Netherlands of October 9, 1974. We affirm.
Our jurisdiction of the appeal is under 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(4)(A), (Pub.L. 97-164, Title 1, § 127(a), Apr. 2,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Application of Guido H. Stempel, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Application of Hans Hilmer, Gerhard Korger, Rudi Weyer and Walter AumullerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Robert L. ClarkeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Karl Ziegler, Heinz Breil, Erhard Holzkamp and Heinz MartinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
3Cited by15 opinions
- Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Opticon, Inc., and Opto ElectronicsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- In Re Jacques Gosteli, Ivan Ernest and Robert B. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Messerschmidt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- American Standard Inc. v. Pfizer Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- In Re Bradley C. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.