Legal Opinion
In Re Bradley C. Carlson
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 1, 1993No. 92-1248PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
Bradley C. Carlson appeals from the January 9,1992 decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board), Appeal No. 91-2823, affirming the examiner’s rejection in reexamination proceeding No. 90/001,935 of the claim of U.S. Design Patent No. 289,855 (Des. 289,855) as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (1988). We affirm.
I
The two issues raised in this appeal are whether the design protected by a German Geschmacksmuster constitutes an “invention ... patented ... in ... a foreign country” within the meaning of 35 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Environmental Designs, Ltd. And the Trentham Corporation v. Union Oil Company of California and Ralph M. Parsons Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Kimberly-Clark Corporation v. Johnson & Johnson and Personal Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In Re Leo M. HallCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- In re WoodCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Denis Rouffet, Yannick Tanguy and Frederic BerthaultCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- David D. Stark, M.D. v. Advanced Magnetics, Inc., Jerome Goldstein, Ernest v. Groman, and Lee JosephsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- In Re Reid HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle, M.B.H. v. Shell Oil Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- In Re Faizulla G. KathawalaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.