Legal Opinion

Messerschmidt v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 30, 1993No. 642-89CPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOCK, Judge.

ín this pro se patent infringement suit, Mr. Eugene D. Messerschmidt (Messerschmidt), seeks compensation under 28 U.S.C. § 1498 (1988) from the United States for the unauthorized use of U.S. Patent No. 4,134,560 (the ’560 patent), entitled “Helicopter Control Device.” The plaintiff’s patent describes a mechanical helicopter control system which enables a helicopter pilot to control all flight functions (pitch, roll, heave, and yaw) with one hand. The plaintiff contends that the United States and contractors of the United States have infringed the ’560 patent by the…

2Cases cited176 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966

171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Aerolease Long Beach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  2. Maniere v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  3. Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  4. McLain Plumbing & Electrical Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  5. Osborn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API