Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Opticon, Inc., and Opto Electronics
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
Symbol Technologies, Inc., (Symbol) sued Opticon, Inc., and its Japanese parent Opto Electronics, (collectively hereinafter Opti-con), in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for infringement of certain claims of United States Patent Nos. 4,387,297 (’297 patent), 4,593,186 (’186 patent), and 4,409,470 (’470 patent).
Symbol alleged that Opticon’s MSH-840, MSH-850 and MSH-860 devices were infringing. Opticon denied infringement and filed a counterclaim for a declaratory judgment that the ’297 and ’186 patents are invalid and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Amgen Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (Now Known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Eurand, Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- In Re Bose Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Brasseler, U.S.A. I, L.P. v. Stryker Sales Corporation and Stryker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.