Legal Opinion

Trisko v. City of Waite Park

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 1997No. C0-97-86PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAROLD W. SCHULTZ, Judge.

Appellant Meridian Aggregates Company challenges the trial court’s summary judgment for respondent City of Waite Park denying Meridian’s application for a conditional use permit to operate a rock quarry. Because we conclude that the city’s denial of the permit was unreasonable, arbitrary, and capricious, we reverse and order the issuance of the appropriate conditional use permit.

FACTS

Appellant operates a 98-acre rock quarry on a 250-acre site and owns an adjacent 142-acre parcel of property that it purchased in 1992 from another mining company on which it plans…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Swanson v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Barton Contracting Co., Inc. v. City of AftonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. C. R. Investments, Inc. v. Village of ShoreviewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Hurrle v. County of Sherburne Ex Rel. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Beca of Alexandria, L.L.P. v. County of Douglas Ex Rel. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Sunrise Lake Ass'n v. Chisago County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API