Legal Opinion
Zylka v. City of Crystal
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 3, 1969No. 41462PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Defendant, city of Crystal, appeals from a judgment declaring that the city council was arbitrary and unreasonable in denying plaintiff landowner a special-use permit to construct a gasoline service station on property located within an area of the city zoned for commercial use, and from an order denying a new trial.
Plaintiff is the owner of a parcel of land located on the northwest corner of 32nd Avenue North and Douglas Drive in the city of Crystal. Under the city’s comprehensive zoning ordinance, this land is within an area classified as a “Commercial C-l” district,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Osius v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- The Alexander Co. v. City of OwatonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Beverly Oil Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Condor Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation v. City of St. Paul, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Littlefield v. City of AftonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.