Legal Opinion
Woog v. Home Mutual Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 9, 1983No. C8-82-1529PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
Because the district court on a motion to vacate an arbitration award of underin-sured motorist benefits failed to make a de novo review of the issues of arbitrability, we reverse the order confirming the award and remand for a district court review of the arbitrability issues.
On January 6, 1979, claimant-respondent Merlyn J. Woog was injured in a two-car automobile accident. At the time, she was driving an automobile owned by Woog Brothers Construction Company, which was insured under a commercial policy by appellant Home Mutual Indemnity Company. Apparently Ms. Woog had no…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. BerthiaumeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FruchtmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Dunshee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Rosenberger v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Arbitration of Fryer v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Safeco Insurance Co. v. GoldenbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Eide v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.