Legal Opinion
Arbitration of Fryer v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 5, 1985No. C8-83-1444PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
The Court of Appeals held that an arbitration claim for uninsured motorist benefits was arbitrable and not subject to a reduction for workers’ compensation paid, and, as had the district court, affirmed the arbitration award. See Fryer v. National Union Fire Insurance Co., 346 N.W.2d 353 (Minn.App.1984). We granted the insurer’s petition for further review. We affirm in part and reverse in part and remand.
On April 12, 1981, claimant Richard G. Fryer, then on duty as a police officer for the City of Brooklyn Park, was injured when his patrol car was rear-ended. The owners of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FruchtmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Brunmeier v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Lick v. Dairyland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Cooper v. YounkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Woog v. Home Mutual Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. League of Minnesota Cities Insurance TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. BangSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Nimmick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- Sawyer v. Midland Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Knut. Co. v. Knutson Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.