Fischer v. Steffen
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.
¶ 1. This case involves the interplay between the subrogation rule and the collateral source rule, a subject most extensively discussed by our supreme court in Paulson v. Allstate Insurance Co., 2003 WI 99, 263 Wis. 2d 520, 665 N.W.2d 744. There, our supreme court held that where "plaintiffs insurance company pays 100 percent of the repair costs, then subsequently settles its subrogation claim with the tortfeasor's insurer for a reduced amount based on plaintiffs alleged contributory negligence," the plaintiff could not collect the difference under the collateral source rule. Id., ¶ 3. Here,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Garrity v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Paulson v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Anderson v. GarberCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Nelson v. L. & J. PRESS CORP.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fischer v. SteffenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Blumenfeld v. JeansCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
- Fischer v. SteffenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Hopp, Raymond v. MJC America, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2025
- J&J Fish on Center Street Inc v. Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022