Nelson v. L. & J. PRESS CORP.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
What caused the punch press to repeat, when set for the “once” operation, and who was responsible for its so doing?
Was the continuous operation of the punch press caused by plaintiff’s operation of the foot pedal? The jury rejected this conclusion as to what happened. It found no contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. That conclusion is supported by evidence that the plaintiff operator was using the foot control at the time of the accident and that the machine was set for the “once” operation and should not have repeated unless the foot control was released and pressed again.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Seaman Body Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Rabata v. DohnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Boutin v. Cardinal Theatre Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Rudzinski v. Warner Theatres, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Chart Ex Rel. Sommer v. General Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Meka v. Falk Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Maurer v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Simmons v. Atlas Vac MacHine Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1980
- Foss v. Town of KronenwetterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.