Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Garber
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided January 23, 1991No. 90-0802PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.
Dr. Brad Garber and Osseo Medical Center, S.C. (collectively Garber) appeal a judgment and denial of post-trial motions in a medical malpractice action and urge that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations. Barbara Anderson and her husband (collectively Anderson) cross-appeal the trial court's decision to eliminate the jury award for medical expenses paid by her insurer. We conclude that the statute of limitations had not expired when Anderson filed her action, and that the jury award of $10,000 for medical expenses should be reinstated.
DISCOVERY OF INJURY
Garber contends the trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hansen v. AH Robins, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Borello v. U.S. Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- Lambert v. WrenschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Heifetz v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Dorothy Williams v. Borden, Inc., and Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Voge v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Stroh Die Casting Co. v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- Totsky v. Riteway Bus Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Orlowski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Sampson v. LogueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.