Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fischer v. Steffen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2011No. 2009AP1669Published

1DissentDavid T. Prosser, J.

¶ 86. (dissenting). This case is not governed by Paulson v. Allstate Ins. Co., 2003 WI 99, 263 Wis. 2d 520, 665 N.W.2d 744. By holding that it is, the court is damaging the right of many plaintiffs to secure a fair recovery for their personal injuries.

¶ 87. To understand this case, it is important to understand the facts. Roger H. Fischer, Sr. and Sandra J. Fischer are husband and wife. They purchased an automobile insurance policy from American Family Insurance Company. The Fischer policy included coverage for $10,000 in medical expenses if one of the insureds were involved in an automobile…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Garrity v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Campbell v. SutliffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Koffman v. LeichtfussWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Vogt v. SchroederWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API