Legal Opinion

VALLEY NAT. BANK OF ARIZONA v. Kohlhase

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 12, 1995No. 1 CA-CV 92-0239, 1 CA-CV 93-0277PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Judge.

In this opinion, we address whether Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 33-814 (1990) precludes a creditor’s cause of action for deficiency because the creditor (1) elects its remedy by foreclosing on a commercial property secured by a deed of a trust by trustee’s sale or (2) initiates an action on a debt before conducting a trustee’s sale but fails to file an “action for deficiency” after but within ninety days of completing the trustee’s sale. We conclude that the statute permits an action for deficiency in either situation.

I

Although the facts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Baker v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Resolution Trust Corp. v. OlsonDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1991
  5. Mercy Healthcare Arizona, Inc. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. RezzonicoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1998
  2. Citibank (Arizona) v. BhandhusaveeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. FonteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  4. Helvetica Servicing Inc v. Michael S PasquanArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Melikian Enterprises, LLLP v. Steven D. McCormickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API