Legal Opinion

Citibank (Arizona) v. Bhandhusavee

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 5, 1996No. 1 CA-CV 95-0165PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VOSS, Judge.

Appellants Choosin Bhandhusavee, Rumbha Bhandhusavee and B.V. Rumbha, M.D., P.C. (collectively, “defendant”) appeal from the trial court’s order granting appellee Citibank (Arizona) (“Citibank”) a continuing lien on defendant’s nonexempt earnings pursuant to the garnishment statutes. See generally Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. (“A.R.S.”) § 12-1598.10. The only issue raised on appeal is whether Citibank was time-barred from seeking garnishment on the remaining balance of the underlying judgment for the debt because it failed to pursue the deficiency between the secured indebtedness…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Arizona Biltmore Estates Ass'n v. TezakCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  3. Bank of Douglas v. NeelArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Faber v. AlthoffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. VALLEY NAT. BANK OF ARIZONA v. KohlhaseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burke v. Arizona State Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  2. Chicago Insurance v. ManterolaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  3. Bank One, Arizona, N.A. v. BeauvaisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. M & I BANK, FSB v. CoughlinDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011
  5. In re WrightUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API