State Ex Rel. Metz v. Ccc Information Services, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KRIEGLER, J.
This appeal arises out of a qui tam action filed by plaintiff and appellant John Metz on behalf of the State of California, alleging defendant and respondent CCC Information Services, Inc., violated Insurance Code section 1871.7 1 by making false or misleading statements in connection with the settlement of Metz’s 1999 automobile insurance claim under a policy issued by Farmers Insurance Company, following an accident in which Metz’s 1992 Mitsubishi Galant suffered a total loss. As more fully explained below, the statements at issue consisted of the “comparable automobile”…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. ZamoraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of La HabraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Quiroz v. Seventh Avenue CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
- San Mateo Union High School District v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Contreras v. DowlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Baxter v. Cal. State Teachers' Ret. Sys., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Larson v. UHS of Rancho Springs CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.