Legal Opinion

Larson v. UHS of Rancho Springs CA4/3

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 3, 2014No. G050081UnpublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARONSON, Acting P. J.

In this appeal, we must decide whether a plaintiff’s claims for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress are based on a health care provider’s professional negligence and therefore are subject to the one-year limitations period set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 340.5. Plaintiff and appellant Wayne Earl Larson alleges defendant and respondent Richard Shuman, M.D., served as the anesthesiologist on Larson’s kidney stone surgery performed at defendant and respondent UHS of Rancho Springs, Inc.'s (UHS) hospital. In performing a preoperative…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Delaney v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Western Steamship Lines, Inc. v. San Pedro Peninsula HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Ivanoff v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Lopez v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Foxen v. CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Womack v. LovellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API