Legal Opinion

Norgart v. Upjohn Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1999No. S071633PublishedCited by 491 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

Under the statute of limitations, a plaintiff must bring a cause of action within the limitations period applicable thereto after accrual of the cause of action. The general rule for defining the accrual of a cause of action sets the date as the time when the cause of action is complete with all of its elements. An exception is the discovery rule, which postpones accrual of a cause of action until the plaintiff discovers, or has reason to discover, the cause of action, until, that is, he at least suspects, or has reason to suspect, a factual basis for its elements.

We granted…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by491 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Shirk v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

486 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API