Legal Opinion

Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of La Habra

California Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2001No. S082591PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

In an action against a city for allegedly imposing and collecting a general tax on its residents without the voter approval mandated by Proposition 62 (Gov. Code, §§ 53720-53730), when does the statute of limitations begin to run? Defendant, the City of La Habra (the City), contends the statute started to run on the date the City enacted its ordinance authorizing the tax. Plaintiffs, three taxpayer advocacy groups and three La Habra taxpayers, argue the statute began to run when this court, in Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. Guardino (1995) 11 Cal.4th…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Levald, Inc. v. City of Palm DesertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Small v. Fritz Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Gomes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. California Cannabis Coalition v. City of UplandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API