Legal Opinion

Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2013No. S184929PublishedCited by 330 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

The common law theory of continuous accrual posits that a cause of action challenging a recurring wrong may accrue not once but each time a new wrong is committed. We consider whether the theory can apply to actions under the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.; hereafter UCL) and, if so, whether it applies here to save plaintiff Jamshid Aryeh’s suit from a limitations bar. We conclude: (1) the text and legislative history of the UCL leave UCL claims as subject to the common law rales of accrual as any other cause of action, and (2) continuous accrual…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by330 opinions

  1. Alta Devices, Inc. v. LG Elecs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. Dean Beaver v. Tarsadia HotelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
  4. Beacon Residential Community Ass'n v. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Fahlen v. Sutter Central Valley HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014

325 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API