Iowa & California Land Co. v. Hoag
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of Riverside County and from orders denying new trials. J. S. Noyes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw,j.
—Both of these actions were actions to foreclose mortgages executed "by the defendants to secure their promissory notes. The notes and the securities passed by sundry transfers and assignments to the plaintiff. The questions, involved upon these appeals are identical, and the cases may therefore be considered and decided together.
The defendants executed their promissory notes, secured by mortgages upon lands in California, to the Union Loan and Trust Company, a foreign corporation organized under the laws of the state of Iowa. The Union Loan and Trust Company, to secure its debenture bonds,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Toby v. Oregon Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Giselman v. StarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Greig v. RiordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Gilman v. KetchamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Boulware v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Reilly v. Antonio Pepe Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Greco v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Koch v. StorySupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Canfield v. ScrippsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Tilden Lumber & Mill Co. v. Bacon Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.