Legal Opinion

Gilman v. Ketcham

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1893PublishedCited by 34 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County. The case was that the plaintiff, in his representative capacity as administrator of the estate of Winthrop W. Gil-man, deceased, on the 24th day of September, 1891, was a creditor of the Hudson River Boot & Shoe Manufacturing Company, a corporation created and existing under the general laws of the state of New York, in which state the plaintiff also resided, in the sum of $941.81, and commenced an action in the circuit…

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County. The case was that the plaintiff, in his representative capacity as administrator of the estate of Winthrop W. Gil-man, deceased, on the 24th day of September, 1891, was a creditor of the Hudson River Boot & Shoe Manufacturing Company, a corporation created and existing under the general laws of the state of New York, in which state the plaintiff also resided, in the sum of $941.81, and commenced an action in the circuit court of Milwaukee county, in which Hubbard & Baker, of West Superior, Wis., were garnished as being indebted to the said…

1Opinion of the CourtPiNNBY, J.

It is not disputed but that the proceedings in the supreme court of New York were properly instituted and conducted, and the dissolution of the corporation regularly adjudged, upon the voluntary application of its trust-oes, and the respondent appointed receiver of all its property, assets, and estate according to the statute of that state, with a view of applying the proceeds equally to the payment of all its creditors, and the distribution of any residue equally to and among its stockholders. The plaintiff in this action wras at the time, and still is, a resident and citizen of the state of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Relfe v. RundleSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Hibernia National Bank v. . LacombeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Matter of Accounting of WaiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Reynolds v. AddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Finney v. GuyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Parker v. Stoughton Mill Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Fisher v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Rickman v. RickmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Castleman v. TemplemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API