Legal Opinion
Tilden Lumber & Mill Co. v. Bacon Land Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 19, 1931No. Docket No. 7584PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The above action was brought to recover on a promissory note assigned to plaintiff corporation. The note with the indorsements thereon is in words and figures as follows:
“11,270.00 Oakland, California,
“September 10, 192'6.
“On or before February 1st, 1928, we jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of Mark R. Monze and Beach C. Soule, Jr., the sum of eleven thousand two hundred and seventy dollars ($11,270.00) with interest thereon at the rate of six (6) per cent from date until paid. Interest payable at maturity.
“If the building that is now projected should be erected and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Title Guarantee Trust Co. v. . Pam.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Aspegren Co., Inc. v. Sherman, Swan Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Grossetti v. SweaseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Manley v. Pacific Mill & Timber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Security-First National Bank v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Mann v. AndrusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.