Legal Opinion
Canfield v. Scripps
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 27, 1936No. Civ. 10621PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROTH, J., pro tem.
Alice L. Canfield, plaintiff and appellant herein, is the executrix of the estate of Byron Hilton Canfield, deceased, and was appointed as such by the superior court of this state, in and for the County of Santa Barbara. She was preceded as the legal and official representative of said estate by E. G. Dodge, special administrator, who had been previously appointed by the same court. This action is one whereby plaintiff seeks damages for conversion of stock belonging to the testate, for which conversion she alleges the defendants are responsible.
During his lifetime, deceased…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Converse v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Vaughan v. NorthupSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- Helme v. . BuckelewNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Keer v. Devises of MoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Dixon's Executors v. Ramsay's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Smith v. CimmetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Farmers & Merchants Trust Co. v. MadeiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Kropp v. Sterling Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Waxman v. KealohaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.