Legal Opinion

Bergeron v. Department of Health Services

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1999No. F029448PublishedCited by 18 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THAXTER, J.

—In this appeal from a judgment denying appellant Marie Bergeron’s petition for writ of mandate, we hold that due process does not require respondent California Department of Health Services (Department) to hold an administrative hearing as to its right to withhold payment of fees claimed by appellant, a Medi-Cal provider, for dental services she rendered. The decision to withhold was made pending an investigation into appellant’s billing practices and was authorized by 42 Code of Federal Regulations section 455.23 (1998).

Facts

Appellant is a dentist engaged in the practice…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Schroeder v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ryan v. California Interscholastic Federation-San Diego SectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Doe v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Doe v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Jones v. OmnitransCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Jacobs v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API