Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Mallen
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 31, 1988No. 87-82PublishedCited by 340 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
The question presented by this appeal concerns the constitutionality of a statutory provision that authorizes the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to suspend from office an indicted official of a federally insured bank. The District Court concluded that the statutory post-suspension procedure is unconstitutional because it does not guarantee the suspended officer a sufficiently prompt decision or an unqualified right to present oral testimony. The District Court therefore enjoined the FDIC from enforcing an order suspending appellee from serving as the president and as a director…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by340 opinions
- Atherton v. District of Columbia Office of the MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Gilbert v. HomarSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- John D. Alvin v. Jon B. SuzukiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Nnebe v. DausCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
335 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.