Legal Opinion
Schroeder v. McDonald
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 19, 1995No. 93-15169PublishedCited by 270 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:
Defendants-appellants (“defendants”) appeal the district court’s denial in part of their motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff-ap-pellee (“plaintiff’) brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court found that defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity with regard to five of plaintiffs eleven causes of action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 530, 105 S.Ct. 2806, 2817, 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985). We find defendants are entitled to qualified immunity on four of the five remaining causes of action. We…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by270 opinions
- Rhodes v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Oscar W. Jones v. Lou Blanas County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Elmer PRATT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James K. ROWLAND; James Gomez, Director; Daniel Vasquez; Robert Borg, Et Al., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Stanley Williams v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, California State Prison, San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Moran v. SeligCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
265 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.