Legal Opinion
Riley v. Dow Corning Corp.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided July 24, 1991No. C-89-486-GPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ERWIN, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the court upon the defendants’ summary judgment motion, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules Civil Procedure. Both sides have briefed the issues, and the matter is now ripe for a ruling. The court hereby rules that defendants’ summary judgment motion as to the plaintiff’s ERISA, age discrimination, wage and overtime compensation, negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and libel and slander claims is granted. The court also grants defendants Garris and Berner’s motion as to the tortious contract interference…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Barry S. GOLDBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B. GREEN AND COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Amos v. Oakdale Knitting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Salt v. Applied Analytical, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Feldman v. Law Enforcement Associates Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Riley v. Dow Corning Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1992
- Citizens for Fauquier County v. SPR Corp.Fauquier County Circuit Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.